Past Events
-
-
• 10/6/21
No Cold War Britain rally: Stop Asian Hate – rising racism and the new cold war
Speakers:
* Murad Qureshi, former Stop the War Chair and London Assembly Member
* Jess Barnard, Chair of Young Labour
* Anna Chen, writer, poet and broadcaster
* Sheila Xiao, co-founder of Pivot to Peace
* Ping Hua, ex-chair of Chinese Association of Southampton
* Suresh Grover, Director of the Monitoring Group
* Madison Tang, CODEPINK
* WahPiow Tan, Human Rights lawyer, Singapore exile and activist
* Aidan from Stop Asian Hate UK
* Mikaela Erskog, No Cold War
-
• 3/12/22
Racism, Witch-hunts and the New Cold War: taking on the new McCarthyism
Featuring:
· Dr Gerald Horne, Chair of History and African American Studies, University of Houston (United States)
· Sheila Xiao, Co-founder of Pivot to Peace (United States)
· Vijay Prashad, Director of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research (India)
· Amanda Yee, Podcaster on politics, culture and media criticism (United States)
· Kevin Li, Qiao Collective (United States)
· Anna Chen, Writer, poet and broadcaster (Britain)
· Nick Estes, Red Nation (United States)
· Dr Ping Hua, Co-founder of the Chinese Association of Southampton and No Cold War Britain (Britain)
· Dr Anthony Pun, Chair of the Chinese Community Council of Australia (Australia)
· Dolores Chew, Fellow of the Canadian Foreign Policy Institute (Canada)
The first casualty in war, hot or cold, is the truth.
As the New Cold War against China escalates, the United States political establishment and its allies are intensifying their efforts to restrict discussion on the international political situation, invoking anti-Chinese racist rhetoric and targeted smear campaigns.
This dangerous agenda seeks to justify an aggressive foreign policy towards China and is having a chilling effect on the political climate within the United States and allied countries such as Britain, Australia, and Canada.
Politicians and the mainstream media demonise China in an attempt to justify the New Cold War. McCarthyite witch-hunts are being launched against individuals for merely questioning or criticizing their government’s foreign policy. Especially concerning is the sharp increase of hate crimes and attacks against people of Chinese and East and Southeast Asian heritage in the West. It is clear that the propaganda war against China is directly fuelling this rise in racism and creating a climate in which Asian diaspora communities are being increasingly treated as “enemies within.”
This repressive environment is not merely a threat to democracy, it also increases the likelihood of dangerous and destructive foreign policy choices by shutting down debate. During the 20th century, McCarthyism prevented robust and objective discussions from taking place in the US about its Cold War foreign policy. This confining approach contributed to disastrous and criminal US policy decisions such as the Vietnam War. A similar atmosphere of fear and racism helped pave the way for the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Instead of adopting these Cold War, ideologically-charged, and alarmist approaches, we must create an open environment which fosters fact-based discussion and dialogue. Racism, witch-hunts, and censorious attacks on free speech are not only reprehensible, but also an obstacle to the global cooperation necessary to resolve the serious problems that the world faces.
On Saturday 12 March, join No Cold War for an international webinar featuring a range of scholars, experts and members of the international Chinese diaspora who will discuss why it is vital to oppose the rise in racism and witch-hunts and build the broadest opposition to the New Cold War.
-
• 11/15/23
What does the rise of the Global South mean for Britain?
This webinar brings together a panel of leading international and British speakers to discuss what the rise of the Global South means for Britain and the prospects for developing an independent foreign policy that contributes towards peace and prosperity instead of war, destruction and poverty.
The British government has followed the United States in pursuing damaging cold war policies against China and other countries, contributing to the massive US-led military build-up around Beijing in the Pacific, fuelling the NATO proxy war against Russia in Ukraine and backing Israel’s brutal war and siege on Gaza.
The US’s agenda of escalating military aggression is rejected by most countries in the world – with the Global South instead favouring a framework of political independence, development, economic-cooperation and peace.
Featuring contributions from:
----------------------------------------------
· Sami Ramadani, Iraqi-born lecturer and writer on Middle East current affairs
· Roger McKenzie, Morning Star International Editor
· Radhika Desai, Professor at the University Manitoba and Director of the Geopolitical Economy Research Group
· William Sakawa, Correspondent for African Stream
· Isabella Yasmin Kajiwara, Shado Magazine Editor
· Vijay Prashad, Director of Tricontinental Institute
· Fiona Edwards, No Cold War International Committee
· Musical performance from Calum Baird
· Hosted by: Ileana Chan and Sequoyah De Souza, No Cold War Britain
-
• 4/19/23
The new cold war is making us poorer
The British government’s obedience to the foreign policy agenda of the United States is leading Britain to pursue an increasingly aggressive cold war policy that is totally against the interests of the British people. Britain’s hostility towards Russia and China, two nuclear armed states, is not only directly contributing to the huge cost of living crisis engulfing the country but is also destabilising the global situation at the expense of peace and prosperity worldwide.
Britain helped scupper the peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in April 2022 – negotiations in which an interim settlement seemed possible.
Britain’s excessive military budget is the fourth largest in the entire world and was higher than Germany, Belgium, Denmark and the Czech Republic combined in 2021.
Britain’s military budget stands at £48 billion - this is draining vital resources away from public services. The billions of pounds that Britain has spent in the past year sending weapons to prolong NATO’s proxy war against Russia in Ukraine could be financing fair pay rises to settle the many pay disputes in the public sector or creating new green jobs to tackle the climate crisis.
Britain’s opposition to peace negotiations and its support for the economic war on Russia are acts of self-harm. The sanctions on Russia have hit living standards in Britain as cheaper Russian energy is being replaced by more expensive US liquefied gas.
The cold war agenda is leading Britain to have poorer relations with China, the world’s most dynamic and fastest growing major economy, which inevitably damages the opportunities for win-win cooperation and comes at the expense of jobs, trade, investment and access to the best and cheapest technology.
-
6/16/22
Opposing the new age of US militarism: Britain's junior role in new threats to world peace
Featuring:
Vijay Prashad, Director of the Tricontinental Institute for Social Research
Kate Hudson, General Secretary of CND
Ajamu Baraka, Green Party candidate for Vice President of the US in 2016 and National Organiser of Black Alliance for Peace
Ping Hua, No Cold War Britain
John Ross, Chongyang Institute For Financial Studies in China and No Cold War
Nora Garcia, Madrid Anti-NATO Peace Summit
Radhika Desai, International Manifesto Group, Professor at the University of Manitoba and Director of the Geopolitical Economy Research Group
Ben Chacko, Editor of the Morning Star
Co-chairs:Suzie Gilbert and Fiona Edwards of No Cold War Britain
The US administration is escalating its aggressive foreign policy on two fronts simultaneously – against both Russia and China. This is seriously destabilising the world and poses a major threat to world peace.
In waging this dangerous militarised offensive the US is attempting to draw in allies from the Global North to play a belligerent role in supporting these US-led attacks. Britain, in particular, is playing a key role in supporting this destructive agenda.
Under the leadership of the US, NATO is holding a Summit at the end of June in Madrid, at a time when this nuclear military organisation is dangerously escalating aggressive activities and is therefore increasingly threatening world peace.
As a key US policy NATO’s expansion into Eastern Europe, and the threat to extend it into Ukraine, was a key factor behind the war in that country. The US and NATO are fighting a proxy war in Ukraine, attempting to prolong this conflict, instead of seeking to bring it to an end.
Britain has played a direct role in opposing steps that would bring the Ukraine war to a rapid end. The fact that the US is able to rely on Britain supporting its actions is useful for Washington as it can be used to claim that there is international support for them and to help draw other countries into these – as was seen in the disastrous military actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.
US military spending in 2021 was $801 billion, more than the next 11 countries put together, and the US is pressing all its NATO allies to increase their own military spending.
Britain has answered this call, recently increasing military spending to £42 billion and now providing an additional £2.8 billion of military aid to Ukraine. This follows from Britain’s Integrated Review of 2021 which decided that the Ministry of Defence should receive its largest sustained spending increase since the Cold War, with a £24 billion increase over four years.
This is a total waste of resources when the world faces serious threats such as the covid pandemic and climate change which require serious global cooperation to solve.
Under the leadership of the US NATO is also expanding its activity far outside its official area of interest, the North Atlantic. NATO participated in the 20-year war in Afghanistan which ended so disastrously in 2021 leaving a devastated country. Now the US is attempting to expand its military activity in other parts of Asia – with China the key target.
Dangerously Britain is following as a junior partner of the US and NATO in this.
This was shown clearly in the recent creation of the AUKUS nuclear alliance between the US, Britain, and Australia – an organisation which even traditional US allies in the Pacific region, such as New Zealand, have refused to participate in.
Britain has also joined in provocative actions supported by the US such as sailing its Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier through the South China Sea – an area where the US has been deliberately attempting to increase militarisation and confrontation. Simultaneously the US has been stepping up aggressive policies around Taiwan – attempting to undermine the ‘One China’ policy which has been the foundation of peaceful relations of China and the US for fifty years since Nixon’s visit to Beijing in 1972.
It is therefore vital that at this time of escalation, of increasing militarism, by the US and NATO that progressive forces both in Britain and internationally demand that Britain does not participate as a junior partner in these aggressive actions by the US and NATO.
This is part of the need for a global effort to halt the increasing US militarism and aggression.
-
5/25/22
NATO, Ukraine and Russia: war, propaganda and censorship
Speakers:
Andrew Feinstein - Author, campaigner and former African National Congress MP
Camila Escalante - Journalist and presenter for Kawsachun News
Asa Winstanley - Journalist and political commentator
Anna Chen - Writer, poet and broadcaster
Kayla Quesada - Academic and geo-political analyst
Steve Sweeney - International Editor of the Morning Star
Chair: Sequoyah De Souza - No Cold War Britain
As NATO continues to escalate its proxy war against Russia in Ukraine, by sending tens of billions of pounds worth of weapons into the warzone, voices in support of peace, dialogue and negotiations are becoming increasingly censored and silenced by the Western mainstream media.
The Western media's coverage of the conflict in Ukraine has been characterised by a narrow consensus of reporting, which significantly distorts and overlooks the geo-political and historical context, and largely ignores alternative voices. NATO’s moves to escalate the war are given unquestioning support.
Dissenting and critical views are smeared with governments and social media platforms banning many independent commentators and alternative media.
With NATO’s dangerous escalation threatening to prolong the war in Ukraine and increase the suffering of the Ukrainian people it is urgent that a balanced and objective public discussion on the path towards de-escalation and peace takes place.